A friend and I talked about what we were reading the other day. She said she had no time for fiction. “None of it’s true, it’s a waste of time.”
Considering we’d both majored in literature back in university, I was rather stunned with her summation. “But fiction is a form of art.”
"Who has time for art in today’s world?”
I do, I thought to myself. I need art now more than ever. “Don’t you think art is a way to make sense of today’s world?” I asked.
“I have no patience for art,” she replied. “It’s been replaced by technology. Why look at a painting when you can see a photograph?”
I shot back, “But art isn’t there to mimic reality, it’s used to interpret reality. It’s not enough to have just the facts.”
She frowned. “It’s not? Tell me why.” “We need to know whose truth we’re reading. Who took the photo? Who researched the story? Facts might seem honest, but like numbers, they can be manipulated.”
She raised her eyebrows at that jab. “Are you saying everything is fiction?”
“Perhaps. I don’t know … but I know that everything has more than one angle to it, more than one perspective.”
“Of course,” she scoffed. “We need to trust our sources. You can’t believe everything you read.”
“In fiction, when you enter other people’s heads,” I offer, "you know that's what you're doing."
“Right,” said my friend. “I’d rather focus on figuring out my own brain.”
“Fiction can help with that,” I suggest.
“So can facts.”
Our talk ends as we agree to disagree. I’ll continue reading and writing fiction because I know that I’m not able to tell the truth … I can only interpret what I experience … and compare it to other’s perspectives.
Of course, I read non-fiction. I love it … especially memoirs with their limited, but authentic point of view. They become an important part of my research. Historical fiction weaves fact and fiction together. Those two strands grow into a braid of three perspectives … the facts, the story, and the reader.
I’ve always considered truth to be a showing, not a telling, revealed between the cracks of a storyline. How did Leonard Cohen put it? “There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”
For other thoughts on this fact vs. fiction topic:
https://annejanzer.com/stories-fiction-facts-truth/
https://stephaniestorey.com/blog/historical-fiction-history-or-fiction
https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/aug/06/lying-historical-fiction
https://jennybhattwriter.com/hfcn-04-reading-historical-fiction/
https://www.cbc.ca/books/cheryl-parisien-wrote-her-historical-fiction-book-the-unweaving-as-a-way-to-embrace-her-m%C3%A9tis-heritage-1.7383541
“The historian will tell you what happened. The novelist will tell you what it felt like.” E.L. Doctorow
And isn't connection what we crave as humans … to understand and, in turn, to be understood?